HookLens

All 81 scraped comments are HackerNews threads in two clusters: ~2016 'holoportation' hype and ~2023 layoffs/cancellation coverage. Direct-experience reports are rare but pointed: one commenter who tried a HoloLens 'almost a year ago' calls it 'just a tiny tiny augmented display' whose 'actual surface area... is way too small to give anything resembling the presented experiences,' noting demos were 'filmed with a camera, not the actual Hololens capture' — the E3 2015 Minecraft demo is called 'a betray to the public eye.' Price is a recurring barrier: '$3,500 for the base model... priced out of consumer use, which makes it invisible to most,' though that same commenter concedes 'it works and is actually really cool.' Commercial headwinds are explicit: Congress 'rejected the US Army's request for $400 million to buy as many as 6,900' combat goggles (Bloomberg, Jan 2023), with layoffs tied to 'Microsoft's inability to sell to the Pentagon.' Genuine niche enthusiasm exists: NASA 'uses Hololens to get the scientists to feel like they're walking on Mars'; a Purdue researcher sees 'so many benefits' for surgical telementoring; an MSFT employee imagines richer remote whiteboarding. Strategic doubts recur: commenters argue only Meta's cheap passthrough-VR approach (Quest) is selling, that the Magic Leap/Microsoft semitransparent-display path is effectively dead, and that Microsoft is 'a proof of concept developer' whose demos people 'wait and forget,' contrasted against Apple shipping polished products. Caveats: many comments are industry meta-commentary (Apple/Meta comparisons, startup economics, Metaverse skepticism) rather than owner reports, and all 25 shown comments carry identical +423/+409 upvote counts — a likely scraping artifact.

No aggregate ratings were found for this product during the last harvest.