THE PRODUCT
Asustor Lockerstor 4 (AS6604T)
4-bay NAS praised for hardware value and aesthetics, but users flag software gaps vs Synology and tricky RAID config pitfalls.
THE VERDICT
REALITY SCORE · OUT OF 10 · CONFIDENCE LOW
COMPOSED FROM
SENTIMENT · 64 REVIEWS
BEST PRICE TODAY
// Affiliate link — score is unaffected.
AT A GLANCE · QUOTABLE
- Rating: 6.2 / 10 (low confidence)
- User voices: 64 across 2 platforms
- Sentiment: 35% positive · 25% negative
- Updated: Jul 14, 2026
GYIBB rates the Asustor Lockerstor 4 (AS6604T) 6.2/10 based on 64 user voices from 2 platforms. Confidence: low. Source: https://gyibb.com/storage-nas/asustor-lockerstor-4-as6604t
BUY IF
Strong hardware specs at lower MSRP than Synology equivalents
- + Praised aesthetics — 'best looking NAS offerings right now' per video commenters
- + Supports NVMe SSDs alongside HDDs with flexible volume management
- + Good value proposition for 4-bay segment per multiple video reviewers
SKIP IF
Software ecosystem 'highly lacking' vs Synology — especially cloud backup
- − RAID configuration pitfalls: mixing SSD brands causes instability per experienced users
- − Screw/drive tray design frustration reported by video commenters
- − Support quality questioned; no clear HDMI Plex passthrough answer
Where the layers disagree ⚡
6 CONTRADICTIONS DETECTEDUSER vs VIDEO: Video commenters actively ASK about mixing drive types in RAID (e.g., '2x10TB mirror + separate JBOD'), while experienced USER commenters WARN this exact practice causes instability and data loss.
USER vs VIDEO: VIDEO coverage praises hardware specs and aesthetics; USER comments confirm hardware wins but repeatedly flag SOFTWARE as the weak point vs Synology — a dimension video reviews barely test.
USER internal contradiction: One user argues mixing brands INCREASES reliability ('if one brand fails, another takes care'), while multiple others call this the #1 rule you should NEVER break — unresolved disagreement in the community.
VIDEO vs USER: NASCompares commenters ask about memory expansion to 16/32GB and HDMI Plex passthrough — neither video provides a definitive answer, leaving buyers without tested confirmation.
USER vs competitor reality: Users dismiss QNAP for frequent vulnerabilities and praise Synology's software, positioning Asustor as the hardware-value middle ground — but with acknowledged software/support deficits.
DATA GAP: BRAND claims were listed as available but no official text was provided; no cross-check possible against marketing promises vs real experience.
WHERE THEY AGREE +
WHERE THEY DON'T −
Where the 64 sources came from
VIEW EVERY CITATION →The four realities of the Asustor Lockerstor 4 (AS6604T)
Most review sites collapse everything into one number. We keep the layers separate so you can see where reality bends.
What actual buyers say
What reviewers showed on camera
ASUSTOR Lockerstor4 AS6604T Review
Vortez · 15,944 views
"[comment] How did you unscrew it?? I tried with 3 philips screw drivers but none work. What weird screws they added. So frustrating! [comment] Trying to find out if I can use this 4-bay NAS with multiple storage models. For example, I’d li…"
KOBi'ler için NAS: Asustor Lockerstor 4 AS6604T İncelemesi
Technopat · 14,484 views
"[comment] Disket Kutusu ürün incelemeye başladı zannettim Berkanı görünce :D [comment] Bu marifetli güzele böyle mükemmel bir tanıtım yakışırdı. Seni tebrik ederim Berkan. Gayet detaylı, bilgi dolu bir anlatımdı. Yapmacıksız doğal halini sa…"
Asustor LockerStor 4 AS6604T Hardware Review
NASCompares · 7,340 views
"[comment] I think Asustor makes the best looking NAS offerings right now. I've been "Asustor-curious" for sometime, just for the aesthetics alone. This model seems like a good value proposition, but I wish it had 5 bays. Other than that,…"
What the press said
What the brand says
no brand page found
* This page may contain affiliate links. No additional cost to you.
SIMILAR IN THIS CATEGORY
See all →
DATA SOURCES & AUDIT
64 data points across 2 platforms, synthesized via GYIBB's Truth Engine and fact-checked against source data before publication.
CONFIDENCE: LOW · ANALYSED: JULY 14, 2026 AT 06:11 AM · PROMPT V1.0 · READ METHODOLOGY →
Was this review helpful?
Embed this review
