REVIEWS / SMART LOCKS / AUGUST WIFI SMART LOCK (4TH GEN) UPDATED JUL 30, 2026 · 42 SOURCES

THE PRODUCT

August WiFi Smart Lock (4th Gen)

August WiFi Smart Lock (4th Gen)

Hardware is praised, but severe battery drain and mesh Wi-Fi connectivity issues frustrate users. Many recommend downgrading to the 3rd Gen.

SMART LOCKS LOW CONFIDENCE

THE VERDICT

2.7

REALITY SCORE · OUT OF 10 · CONFIDENCE LOW

COMPOSED FROM

USERS 2.7 · 39 voices · 100%
CRITICS no published scores yet

SENTIMENT · 42 REVIEWS

+ 15% positive · 20% neutral − 65% negative

OUR VERDICT

WE DON'T RECOMMEND THIS
Score 2.7/10 — no affiliate link by editorial policy
See alternatives →

// Honest verdicts are the whole point. We only monetise products we'd actually recommend.

10 REDDIT 25 YOUTUBE 4 PRODUCTHUNT
USER n=42
VIDEO n=3
BRAND AVAILABLE
INTERNET n=0

AT A GLANCE · QUOTABLE

  • Rating: 2.7 / 10 (low confidence)
  • User voices: 42 across 3 platforms
  • Sentiment: 15% positive · 65% negative
  • Updated: Jul 30, 2026

GYIBB rates the August WiFi Smart Lock (4th Gen) 2.7/10 based on 42 user voices from 3 platforms. Confidence: low. Source: https://gyibb.com/smart-locks/august-wifi-smart-lock-4th-gen

⚠ LIMITED DATA Limited data: 17 comments, 25 videos. Consider as preliminary assessment.

BUY IF

High-quality, reliable physical lock mechanism

  • + Physical key override provides strong peace of mind
  • + Auto-unlock and keypad features offer great convenience when functional
  • + Integrates well with Home Assistant for local NFC unlocking

SKIP IF

Terrible battery life (requires new CR123 batteries every 4-5 weeks)

  • Severe compatibility issues with modern dual-band mesh Wi-Fi
  • Requires complex network workarounds (like custom 2.4GHz SSIDs) to connect
  • Mobile app and software ecosystem feel poorly optimized

Where the layers disagree

4 CONTRADICTIONS DETECTED

USER vs SOFTWARE: Users praise the physical lock as 'super nice' but strongly condemn the software for having 'major gaps' and poor smart home integration.

USER VS BRAND

USER vs NETWORKING: The lock fails to handle modern dual-band mesh Wi-Fi networks gracefully, forcing users into complex workarounds like custom 2.4GHz guest SSIDs.

USER VS BRAND

VIDEO vs DESIGN EVOLUTION: The 4th Gen's shift to a Wi-Fi-only architecture severely degraded battery life compared to the 3rd Gen's Z-Wave bridge, prompting many users to abandon the newer model.

VIDEO VS USER

USER vs SUPPORT: While some users praised August's phone support for fixing simple issues, others complained that support strictly read from scripts and couldn't solve the core Wi-Fi connectivity problems.

USER VS BRAND

WHERE THEY AGREE +

+ High-quality, reliable physical lock mechanism
+ Physical key override provides strong peace of mind
+ Auto-unlock and keypad features offer great convenience when functional
+ Integrates well with Home Assistant for local NFC unlocking

WHERE THEY DON'T

Terrible battery life (requires new CR123 batteries every 4-5 weeks)
Severe compatibility issues with modern dual-band mesh Wi-Fi
Requires complex network workarounds (like custom 2.4GHz SSIDs) to connect
Mobile app and software ecosystem feel poorly optimized

Where the 42 sources came from

VIEW EVERY CITATION →
REDDIT
10
YOUTUBE
25
PRODUCTHUNT
4

The four realities of the August WiFi Smart Lock (4th Gen)

Most review sites collapse everything into one number. We keep the layers separate so you can see where reality bends.

01
USER
n=42 · 3 platforms

What actual buyers say

Users report significant difficulties integrating the August WiFi Smart Lock (4th Gen) with modern mesh Wi-Fi systems like Google Nest. Because the lock requires a 2.4GHz connection, it fails to connect gracefully to dual-band SSIDs, unlike other IoT devices. Users are forced to create complex workarounds, such as dedicated 2.4GHz guest networks or bridging an old router, which breaks local smart home integrations like Google Assistant. While the physical lock itself is described as 'super nice,' the software is heavily criticized for having 'major gaps.' August's customer support receives mixed reviews; some found them helpful, while others noted agents were strictly reading from scripts without offering real solutions for the Wi-Fi issues.
02
VIDEO
n=25 · YouTube

What reviewers showed on camera

Video reviewers and commenters overwhelmingly highlight the 4th Gen's terrible battery life as its biggest flaw. Unlike the 3rd Gen, which used a low-power Z-Wave bridge, the 4th Gen relies solely on Wi-Fi, causing it to burn through expensive CR123 batteries in just 4 to 5 weeks. Many users explicitly state they returned the lock or downgraded back to the 3rd Gen with a Connect bridge to resolve the battery drain. Despite the power issues, the physical hardware is praised for its solid build quality, the peace of mind provided by the physical key backup, and its seamless integration with Ring doorbells. Advanced users note that integrating the lock via Home Assistant allows for fast and stable NFC unlocks.

August Wifi Smart Lock Review - 6 Months Later

6 Months Later · 221,551 views

"[comment] I live in South Korea and, here, keys are pretty much a think of the past. It has been 5 years now without carrying a key, and this is wonderful. I don't know why the electronic locks used here are not more popular everywhere. The…"

August Wi-Fi Smart Lock (4th Generation) Review

Best Buy Canada Product Videos · 25,402 views

"[comment] Why are you concerned with the wifi when the unit also works on bluetooth?! [comment] Wait, did you just tell the world exactly where you keep your spare house key? [comment] I dont get why you need or use a keypad if it has an au…"

August Wi-Fi 4th Gen Smart Lock Review | The Sneaky Smart Lock

Safewise.com · 13,530 views

"[comment] Buy version 3 well worth it [comment] Great lock, but battery life is absolutely terrible. First set of batteries lasted less than a month. Second set lasted a bit longer, but only 5 weeks. For the price, it needs to be better.…"

03
INTERNET
n=0 · review sites

What the press said

No aggregate ratings were found for this product during the last harvest.
04
BRAND
official source

What the brand says

no brand page found

The official brand page was not successfully scraped during the last harvest.
Visit Official Site →

SIMILAR IN THIS CATEGORY

See all →
Wyze Lock Bolt

Wyze Lock Bolt

6.7

✓ Purchasers report genuine enthusiasm and multi-unit orders ('ordered 3 more')

Schlage Encode Plus WiFi Smart Lock

Schlage Encode Plus WiFi Smart Lock

6.6

✓ Strong build quality and Schlage's established lock-making history per multiple long-term users

Kwikset Halo Touch Fingerprint Smart Lock

Kwikset Halo Touch Fingerprint Smart Lock

5.2

✓ Fingerprint concept is convenient when it works

Sifely Smart Lock S1

Sifely Smart Lock S1

5.1

✓ Keyless entry and multiple unlock methods offer strong convenience

DATA SOURCES & AUDIT

10
REDDIT
25
YOUTUBE
4
PRODUCTHUNT
3
YOUTUBE VIDEOS

42 data points across 3 platforms, synthesized via GYIBB's Truth Engine and fact-checked against source data before publication.

CONFIDENCE: LOW · ANALYSED: JULY 30, 2026 AT 07:47 PM · PROMPT V1.0 · READ METHODOLOGY →

Was this review helpful?

Embed this review

Writing about August WiFi Smart Lock (4th Gen)? Add the GYIBB verdict — free, no account needed.

<a href="https://gyibb.com/smart-locks/august-wifi-smart-lock-4th-gen" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
  <img src="https://gyibb.com/badge/smart-locks/august-wifi-smart-lock-4th-gen.svg" alt="GYIBB rating for August WiFi Smart Lock (4th Gen)" width="220" height="56">
</a>
← Back to all reviews

August WiFi Smart Lock (4th Gen)

GYIBB SCORE: 2.7/10

See alternatives →