REVIEWS / PHOTO EDITING / AFFINITY PHOTO 2 UPDATED MAY 30, 2026 · 246 SOURCES

THE PRODUCT

Affinity Photo 2

Affinity Photo 2

A strong one-time-purchase Photoshop alternative hampered by Adobe muscle memory, RAW performance issues, and UI learning curves.

PHOTO EDITING HIGH CONFIDENCE

THE VERDICT

7.5

REALITY SCORE · OUT OF 10 · CONFIDENCE HIGH

COMPOSED FROM

USERS 7.5 · 243 voices · 100%
CRITICS no published scores yet

SENTIMENT · 246 REVIEWS

+ 52% positive · 28% neutral − 20% negative
Visit Official Site →
●58 YOUTUBE ●15 HN ●157 LEMMY ●13 PRODUCTHUNT
USER● n=246
VIDEO● n=3
BRAND● AVAILABLE
INTERNET● n=0
🦉 We read 246 owner comments — see the recurring complaints & praise OWNER INSIGHTS →

AT A GLANCE · QUOTABLE

  • Rating: 7.5 / 10 (high confidence)
  • User voices: 246 across 4 platforms
  • Sentiment: 52% positive · 20% negative
  • Updated: May 30, 2026

GYIBB rates the Affinity Photo 2 7.5/10 based on 246 user voices from 4 platforms. Confidence: high. Source: https://gyibb.com/photo-editing/affinity-photo-2

BUY IF

One-time purchase with years of free updates — no subscription trap

  • + Professional-grade output suitable for advertising, magazines, and print work
  • + Significantly cheaper than Adobe over a 3-5 year horizon
  • + Active development and regular updates (V1 through V2.5 noted)

SKIP IF

Noticeable performance lag vs Photoshop, especially in RAW processing — hardware requirements unclear

  • − Steep relearning curve for Adobe veterans — muscle memory disruption reported across multiple users
  • − Missing pro features: inferior object selection, weaker RAW noise reduction, unconfirmed frequency separation support
  • − UI differs significantly from Photoshop with no guided migration path

Where the layers disagree ⚡

5 CONTRADICTIONS DETECTED

ALIGNMENT (USER + VIDEO): Both layers report lag/slow performance — one USER says 'sometimes it's slow and laggy' vs PS, and a VIDEO commenter reports 'helluva slow' RAW processing, suggesting a real performance gap Adobe users will notice.

VIDEO VS USER

ALIGNMENT (USER + VIDEO): Both layers confirm missing or weaker features vs Adobe — USERS question frequency separation and dodge/burn; VIDEO reviewer Brendan Williams specifically calls out inferior object selection and RAW noise reduction.

VIDEO VS USER

TENSION (USER vs VIDEO): USERS report high switching friction ('can't get used to it,' 'Adobe muscle memory') while VIDEO features a pro designer who switched completely — suggesting success is use-case dependent and may require weeks of relearning, not days.

VIDEO VS USER

GAP (USER + VIDEO): Linux users in comments discuss Affinity compatibility but no VIDEO or confirmed user data addresses Linux viability; this remains an open question for that audience.

VIDEO VS USER

GAP (MISSING): No INTERNET or BRAND layer data available to validate claims about feature completeness, performance benchmarks, or official hardware requirements — critical for pro workflow decisions.

BRAND VS INTERNET

WHERE THEY AGREE +

+ One-time purchase with years of free updates — no subscription trap
+ Professional-grade output suitable for advertising, magazines, and print work
+ Significantly cheaper than Adobe over a 3-5 year horizon
+ Active development and regular updates (V1 through V2.5 noted)
+ Cross-platform availability (Windows, macOS, iPad)

WHERE THEY DON'T −

− Noticeable performance lag vs Photoshop, especially in RAW processing — hardware requirements unclear
− Steep relearning curve for Adobe veterans — muscle memory disruption reported across multiple users
− Missing pro features: inferior object selection, weaker RAW noise reduction, unconfirmed frequency separation support
− UI differs significantly from Photoshop with no guided migration path
− No native Linux support; only potential Wine compatibility

Where the 246 sources came from

VIEW EVERY CITATION →
YOUTUBE
58
HN
15
LEMMY
157
PRODUCTHUNT
13

The four realities

Most review sites collapse everything into one number. We keep the layers separate so you can see where reality bends.

01
USER
n=246 · 4 platforms

What actual buyers say

User sentiment is dominated by Adobe refugees seeking a non-subscription alternative. Multiple HackerNews users (all +21) affirm Affinity Photo is 'excellent' and 'probably the best you will find' vs Adobe, but a recurring friction is 'Adobe muscle memory' — users report having to re-learn workflows every session. One user tried daily-driving it for a week and 'couldn't get used to it,' citing UI confusion, laggy performance ('sometimes it's slow and laggy, coming from PS this is huge'), and functions that 'don't produce satisfying outcomes.' Professional ex-photojournalists acknowledge the learning curve but find it manageable over time. Feature-specific questions about dodge & burn and frequency separation appear multiple times, suggesting photographers need reassurance these pro tools work. Several users simply never switch, opting for GIMP, Krita, Pixelmator Pro ($40 macOS-only), Photopea (free browser-based), or even Canva for quick tasks. Linux users discuss Wine compatibility as a potential path but no confirmed success with Affinity specifically. Political/piracy comments from Lemmy are noise unrelated to the product.
02
VIDEO
n=58 · YouTube

What reviewers showed on camera

Three YouTube sources converge on Affinity Photo 2 as a legitimate Photoshop competitor. Olivio Sarikas (250K subs, 135K views) framed it as an upgrade-worthiness question; commenters highlight the one-time purchase model and multi-year free updates as core value: '$100 after 5 years for Affinity is still quite a bargain.' Brendan Williams (202K subs, 96K views) is the strongest signal: a professional designer who edited photos 'for advertising, magazines, books' since Photoshop v1 and switched completely to Affinity at V2.5. He explicitly identifies missing features — 'better object selection refinement using color decontamination, better noise reduction in RAW development' — but calls it a 'fair comparison.' His switching rationale was purely anti-subscription: 'I just couldn't go along with renting software.' Chris Wright Photography (6.4K subs, 28K views) provides expert-level review; comments reveal a performance red flag: 'On my PC it's helluva slow' for RAW-to-JPEG processing, with the user noting 'there was no mention of specs required to get the best optimum performance.' No video adequately addresses minimum hardware requirements.

Affinity Photo 2 - WORTH the UPGRADE? Should you buy it?

Olivio Sarikas · 135,806 views

"[comment] Are you ready to upgrade to Affinity Photo2? Let me know in the comments! [comment] I’m planning to buy it to support the people at Affinity. I want to support them and their business model. Many other SW developers have gone to a…"

Affinity For Photographers - It's free... but there's a problem

Brendan Williams · 96,002 views

"[comment] 📝 Get My 5-Step EDITING Workflow Cheat Sheet 👉 https://bwillcreative.kit.com/photo-editing-cheat-sheet [comment] As a designer who's edited _countless_ photos for advertising, magazines, books and online since Photoshop v1 (throug…"

Affinity Photo 2 EXPERT Review Is It A REAL Alternative To Adobe?

Chris Wright Photography · 28,196 views

"[comment] I LOVE your videos. Pure knowledge, no filler! I can learn from your teaching so easily. [comment] Whats the Specs on your pc . How long does it take the program for processed raw files to JPEG . On my pc it's helluva slow .…"

03
INTERNET
n=0 · review sites

What the press said

No aggregate ratings were found for this product during the last harvest.
04
BRAND
official source

What the brand says

no brand page found

The official brand page was not successfully scraped during the last harvest.
Visit Official Site →

SIMILAR IN THIS CATEGORY

See all →
Adobe Photoshop 2024

Adobe Photoshop 2024

7.5

✓ Comprehensive professional feature set unmatched by alternatives for production workflows

Skylum Luminar Neo

Skylum Luminar Neo

5.8

✓ One-time payment ($100-130 on sale) vs Adobe's recurring subscription

Adobe Lightroom Classic

Adobe Lightroom Classic

3.7

✓ Full-featured RAW processing with robust cataloging for large offline libraries

DATA SOURCES & AUDIT

58
YOUTUBE
15
HN
157
LEMMY
13
PRODUCTHUNT
3
YOUTUBE VIDEOS

246 data points across 4 platforms, synthesized via GYIBB's Truth Engine and fact-checked against source data before publication.

CONFIDENCE: HIGH · ANALYSED: MAY 30, 2026 AT 05:42 PM · PROMPT V1.0 · READ METHODOLOGY →

Was this review helpful?

Embed this review

Writing about Affinity Photo 2? Add the GYIBB verdict — free, no account needed.

GYIBB rating for Affinity Photo 2 
<a href="https://gyibb.com/photo-editing/affinity-photo-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
  <img src="https://gyibb.com/badge/photo-editing/affinity-photo-2.svg" alt="GYIBB rating for Affinity Photo 2" width="220" height="56">
</a>
← Back to all reviews

Affinity Photo 2

GYIBB SCORE: 7.5/10

Visit →