Type.com

The 134 harvested comments (top 25 shown, from Lemmy) mostly come from a thread where people took a typing speed test and posted scores. Dominant pattern: mobile touch typing is far slower than physical keyboards. Reported results include 25 WPM/83% (longtime hardware-keyboard phone user), 34 WPM/95%, 43 WPM/95% on Gboard Dvorak no-swipe (a 911 dispatcher who historically hit 80-100+ WPM on real keyboards), 53 WPM touch vs 42 WPM swipe, 70 WPM on a BlackBerry-style physical phone keyboard, 78 WPM/92% on Gboard (same user claims ~200 WPM desktop), and one user citing 100-110 WPM average on PC. Functional complaints target input handling rather than the test itself: one user's swipe keyboard caused the website to 'double enter words randomly when I would otherwise type fine'; SwiftKey's auto-capitalization 'gave me 0 wpm due to errors.' A side-debate about Android keyboards (FlorisBoard praised by many but criticized for lacking autocorrect in early beta, OpenBoard, Unexpected Keyboard) shows the audience skews technical and open-source-leaning. Significant dataset noise: several high-upvote comments concern an Arch Linux AUR malware incident (libgdata PKGBUILD pushed Jun 11, 2026 14:59 GMT, reverted ~2.5h later; aur-malware-check tool) and text-adventure game zines — clearly off-thread or mis-scraped. Direct sentiment about the typing site itself is thin: scores are posted matter-of-factly, with mild frustration only around swipe/autocorrect edge cases.

No aggregate ratings were found for this product during the last harvest.