REVIEWS / MUSIC SERVICES / YOUTUBE MUSIC PREMIUM UPDATED JUL 13, 2026 · 774 SOURCES

THE PRODUCT

YouTube Music Premium

YouTube Music Premium

Bundled with YT Premium, valued for rare tracks & music videos, but UX and Google's pricing greed erode goodwill.

MUSIC SERVICES HIGH CONFIDENCE

THE VERDICT

3.6

REALITY SCORE · OUT OF 10 · CONFIDENCE HIGH

COMPOSED FROM

USERS 3.6 · 771 voices · 100%
CRITICS no published scores yet

SENTIMENT · 774 REVIEWS

+ 25% positive · 15% neutral − 60% negative

OUR VERDICT

WE DON'T RECOMMEND THIS
Score 3.6/10 — no affiliate link by editorial policy
See alternatives →

// Honest verdicts are the whole point. We only monetise products we'd actually recommend.

●10 REDDIT ●58 YOUTUBE ●686 LEMMY ●5 STACK EXCHANGE ●12 PRODUCTHUNT
USER● n=774
VIDEO● n=3
BRAND● AVAILABLE
INTERNET● n=0
🦉 We read 774 owner comments — see the recurring complaints & praise OWNER INSIGHTS →

AT A GLANCE · QUOTABLE

  • Rating: 3.6 / 10 (high confidence)
  • User voices: 774 across 5 platforms
  • Sentiment: 25% positive · 60% negative
  • Updated: Jul 13, 2026

GYIBB rates the YouTube Music Premium 3.6/10 based on 774 user voices from 5 platforms. Confidence: high. Source: https://gyibb.com/music-services/youtube-music-premium

BUY IF

Bundled free with YouTube Premium — eliminates need for separate music subscription

  • + Vast catalog including rare, unlisted, and unofficial tracks plus full music videos
  • + Free tier available — does not force a paid subscription
  • + Offline downloads for Premium subscribers

SKIP IF

Aggressive price increases with bundled YT Premium users resent paying for both

  • − Google's anti-ad-blocking crackdown and Shorts injection signal creeping enshittification
  • − UI polish lags Spotify/Apple (missing animations, weak lock-screen widget support)
  • − Persistent fear Google will kill the product as it did Google Play Music

Where the layers disagree ⚡

5 CONTRADICTIONS DETECTED

DATA QUALITY: Top Reddit comments appear to be about a DIFFERENT product (indie internet radio app), NOT YouTube Music Premium — this creates a false negative signal in user_reality.

VIDEO VS INTERNET

USER (Lemmy) vs VIDEO: Lemmy users resent the $400/year price and Google's anti-ad-blocking crackdown, while video commenters see YT Premium bundling as a value win — the same bundle is perceived as either exploitation or a bargain depending on the audience.

VIDEO VS USER

USER vs VIDEO on trust: Lemmy users predict Google will inject ads into Premium tiers eventually; video commenters separately fear Google will kill YT Music like Google Play Music — both converge on low trust in Google's product stewardship.

VIDEO VS USER

VIDEO internal tension: YouTube Music is praised for having rare/unlisted tracks and full music videos (content moat), but criticized for lacking UI polish (animations, lock-screen widgets) that competitors offer.

VIDEO VS USER

USER vs VIDEO on free value: Video commenters highlight that YT Music doesn't force a subscription, but Lemmy users argue even the paid tier faces creeping enshittification (Shorts injection, PiP restrictions, price hikes).

VIDEO VS USER

WHERE THEY AGREE +

+ Bundled free with YouTube Premium — eliminates need for separate music subscription
+ Vast catalog including rare, unlisted, and unofficial tracks plus full music videos
+ Free tier available — does not force a paid subscription
+ Offline downloads for Premium subscribers

WHERE THEY DON'T −

− Aggressive price increases with bundled YT Premium users resent paying for both
− Google's anti-ad-blocking crackdown and Shorts injection signal creeping enshittification
− UI polish lags Spotify/Apple (missing animations, weak lock-screen widget support)
− Persistent fear Google will kill the product as it did Google Play Music
− Difficulty re-downloading previously saved music reported by users

Where the 774 sources came from

VIEW EVERY CITATION →
REDDIT
10
YOUTUBE
58
LEMMY
686
STACK EXCHANGE
5
PRODUCTHUNT
12

The four realities of the YouTube Music Premium

Most review sites collapse everything into one number. We keep the layers separate so you can see where reality bends.

01
USER
n=774 · 5 platforms

What actual buyers say

The user comment dataset is notably fragmented between two distinct products. The top-voted Reddit comments (upvotes 1345–747) appear to be about an entirely different early-stage internet-radio web app — criticizing amateur UX, cluttered interface, broken HTML, asking for real names, and needing a professional designer. These do NOT describe YouTube Music Premium. The Lemmy comments (upvotes 132–50) ARE clearly about YouTube Premium / YouTube Music. Those users express strong resentment toward Google's pricing ($400/year mentioned as excessive), aggressive anti-ad-blocking measures, and concerns that ads will eventually infiltrate Premium tiers ('Give it six months... there WILL be ads in YouTube premium'). Multiple users explicitly state they will refuse to pay Google and rely on uBlock Origin instead. One user notes they cancelled after a price-increase email and resents that YouTube and Music are bundled ('Google need to separate YouTube and Music'). Another values the service only for pragmatism — simplest ad-free mobile experience and offline downloads — but was alienated when PiP was restricted and Shorts was forced onto the home page. Net sentiment from the YouTube-relevant subset is heavily negative on price and trust, with a minority who tolerate it for utility.
02
VIDEO
n=58 · YouTube

What reviewers showed on camera

Three YouTube videos compare YouTube Music against Spotify and Apple Music or review it standalone. Comment-derived insights: (1) YouTube Music does NOT force a subscription — a significant free-tier advantage noted by viewers. (2) Bundling with YouTube Premium is seen as a major value multiplier — users who already paid for YT Premium found music included at no extra cost, eliminating the need for a separate Spotify subscription. (3) YouTube Music's catalog includes unlisted, rare, and unofficial tracks plus full music videos — users repeatedly cite this as its decisive edge over Spotify/Apple Music. (4) Counterpoint: the UI polish (e.g., animated now-playing screens that Spotify/Apple have) is seen as lacking — one commenter mocks 'how will I ever listen to music' without animations, acknowledging the gap dismissively. (5) A persistent fear across video comments is Google killing the product like it did Google Play Music. (6) Practical friction: difficulty re-downloading previously saved music and missing lock-screen widget questions suggest UX gaps. Overall video-reality sentiment is mixed-to-cautiously-positive — strong on catalog and bundling, weak on UX polish and trust in Google's longevity.

Here is why YouTube Music is not as good as Spotify or Apple Music…🎵

The TechVengers (Jay Ai) · 796,432 views

"[comment] Right.... 'cause everyone is staring at their phone while listening all the time 🧐 [comment] 1. YouTube music doesn’t force you to buy a subscription [comment] It took me a minute to understand that the creator is talking about th…"

Apple Music vs. YouTube Music vs. Spotify in 2025

6 Months Later · 355,622 views

"[comment] Start transferring your music today for free at: https://www.tunemymusic.com/?source=6monthslater&utm_source=6monthslater&medium=Apple-Music-vs-Spotify&campaign=comparisonVideo2025&innerpage=comparisonVideo2025 (sponsored) 🛒 Produ…"

Youtube Music Premium - A Complete Review

Charles Cleyn · 65,803 views

"[comment] Do you use Youtube Premium? Tell is in a comment what you think and if you're a musician post your music in the comments for us to listen. 🎵 [comment] One of my worries with Youtube music is that google will ditch it for another p…"

03
INTERNET
n=0 · review sites

What the press said

No aggregate ratings were found for this product during the last harvest.
04
BRAND
official source

What the brand says

no brand page found

The official brand page was not successfully scraped during the last harvest.
Visit Official Site →

SIMILAR IN THIS CATEGORY

See all →
Tidal Free

Tidal Free

8.2

✓ Lossless FLAC and MQA audio quality

Qobuz Studio

Qobuz Studio

7.6

✓ Excellent high-resolution audio quality (FLAC up to 24-bit/192kHz)

Tidal HiFi Plus

Tidal HiFi Plus

6.8

✓ Superior, less commercialized music discovery algorithms

Apple Music Individual

Apple Music Individual

6.5

✓ Lossless audio and Dolby Spatial Audio at no extra cost

DATA SOURCES & AUDIT

10
REDDIT
58
YOUTUBE
686
LEMMY
5
STACK EXCHANGE
12
PRODUCTHUNT
3
YOUTUBE VIDEOS

774 data points across 5 platforms, synthesized via GYIBB's Truth Engine and fact-checked against source data before publication.

CONFIDENCE: HIGH · ANALYSED: JULY 13, 2026 AT 11:31 PM · PROMPT V1.0 · READ METHODOLOGY →

Was this review helpful?

Embed this review

Writing about YouTube Music Premium? Add the GYIBB verdict — free, no account needed.

GYIBB rating for YouTube Music Premium 
<a href="https://gyibb.com/music-services/youtube-music-premium" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
  <img src="https://gyibb.com/badge/music-services/youtube-music-premium.svg" alt="GYIBB rating for YouTube Music Premium" width="220" height="56">
</a>
← Back to all reviews

YouTube Music Premium

GYIBB SCORE: 3.6/10

See alternatives →