REVIEWS / LENSES / CANON RF 24-105MM F/4L IS USM UPDATED AUG 20, 2026 · 54 SOURCES

THE PRODUCT

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Sharp, fast-focusing L zoom praised by long-term owners; caveats are haze near close focus wide open and a price that tripled vs the STM version.

LENSES LOW CONFIDENCE

THE VERDICT

9.4

REALITY SCORE · OUT OF 10 · CONFIDENCE LOW

COMPOSED FROM

USERS 9.4 · 51 voices · 100%
CRITICS no published scores yet

SENTIMENT · 54 REVIEWS

+ 78% positive · 16% neutral − 6% negative

BEST PRICE TODAY

BUY ON AMAZON
Affiliate · supports independent reviews
CHECK PRICE →

// Affiliate link — score is unaffected.

●50 YOUTUBE ●1 PRODUCTHUNT
USER● n=54
VIDEO● n=3
BRAND● AVAILABLE
INTERNET● n=0

AT A GLANCE · QUOTABLE

  • Rating: 9.4 / 10 (low confidence)
  • User voices: 54 across 2 platforms
  • Sentiment: 78% positive · 6% negative
  • Updated: Aug 20, 2026

GYIBB rates the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM 9.4/10 based on 54 user voices from 2 platforms. Confidence: low. Source: https://gyibb.com/lenses/canon-rf-24-105mm-f-4l-is-usm

⚠ LIMITED DATA Limited data: 4 comments, 50 videos. Consider as preliminary assessment.

BUY IF

Owners and reviewers agree it is exceptionally sharp for a standard zoom

  • + Fast autofocus, explicitly praised by users
  • + Versatile 24-105mm range for travel, video, and general use
  • + Strong long-term satisfaction signal (4-year owner review, repeat buyers)

SKIP IF

Hazy image quality near minimum focus distance wide open (to ~1m)

  • − Price rose to ~$1,300 — roughly 3x the non-L STM alternative
  • − Constant f/4 pushes users toward fast primes for low light/portraits
  • − Persistent 'kit lens' perception despite L-grade optics

Where the layers disagree ⚡

5 CONTRADICTIONS DETECTED

ALIGNMENT (USER ↔ VIDEO): users call it 'one of the sharpest lenses I've ever owned' and the comparison-video thread agrees the L's optics clearly beat the STM; the close-focus haze flagged in Christopher Frost's test is independently confirmed by a user's own experience up to ~1m.

VIDEO VS USER

TENSION (VIDEO ↔ USER): the Camerahoarders comparison concludes the L's optics are unbeatable, but several USER comments recommend skipping it entirely for the $400 STM + RF 50mm f/1.8 + speedlight combo — an optics verdict colliding with a value verdict now that the L costs ~3x the STM.

VIDEO VS USER

TENSION (USER ↔ BRAND/INTERNET): users report the price climbed to ~$1,300, but with BRAND and INTERNET layers empty there is no official pricing or expert-aggregate data to verify whether this repricing reflects the lens's current positioning.

BRAND VS INTERNET

ALIGNMENT (USER ↔ VIDEO): AF speed is praised in user comments and no dissenting autofocus claim appears in any video layer.

BRAND VS VIDEO

TENSION (USER internal): the lens carries 'kit lens' stigma ('Don't turn your nose up at this kit lens') yet owners insist its optics are L-grade sharp — a perception-vs-performance gap inside the user layer itself.

USER VS BRAND

WHERE THEY AGREE +

+ Owners and reviewers agree it is exceptionally sharp for a standard zoom
+ Fast autofocus, explicitly praised by users
+ Versatile 24-105mm range for travel, video, and general use
+ Strong long-term satisfaction signal (4-year owner review, repeat buyers)

WHERE THEY DON'T −

− Hazy image quality near minimum focus distance wide open (to ~1m)
− Price rose to ~$1,300 — roughly 3x the non-L STM alternative
− Constant f/4 pushes users toward fast primes for low light/portraits
− Persistent 'kit lens' perception despite L-grade optics

Where the 54 sources came from

VIEW EVERY CITATION →
YOUTUBE
50
PRODUCTHUNT
1

The four realities of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Most review sites collapse everything into one number. We keep the layers separate so you can see where reality bends.

01
USER
n=54 · 2 platforms

What actual buyers say

Across 51 comments (top 25 shown, mostly YouTube), owner sentiment is strongly positive: one calls it 'one of the sharpest lenses I've ever owned,' another 'near perfect if not the perfect kit lens.' Autofocus speed draws explicit praise ('wow that AF speed tho...'). A long-term owner reports using the EF predecessor 90% of the time on a 1DX for video, photos, and travel, and says the RF version on an R5c 'is so versatile' with good subject separation when close to the subject. One user independently confirms an optical flaw: 'hazy image quality when close to minimum focus distance wide open (and up to about 1 meter focus distance in my experience).' Price is the main friction: 'Five years later, this lens is now $1300,' and on the comparison video, 'the L is now three times the price of the non-L one.' Several users propose cheaper workarounds: 'Go with 24-105 STM and buy RF 50mm 1.8 for portrait and low light and buy speed light,' while others pair the L with the RF 35 f/1.8 macro STM for travel. Many comments express trust in the reviewer (Christopher Frost) rather than evaluating the lens itself — a signal about data reliability, not product quality. Note: all shown comments carry +0 upvotes, so engagement weighting is weak.
02
VIDEO
n=50 · YouTube

What reviewers showed on camera

Three YouTube videos cover the lens. (1) Christopher Frost (376k subs, ~545k views), 'Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM lens review with samples' — a commenter calls it 'the only truly unbiased review that mentioned the hazy image quality when close to minimum focus distance wide open,' confirming the test flagged the close-focus flaw; the same thread contains the 'sharpest lenses I've ever owned' endorsement and notes the lens now costs $1,300. (2) Camerahoarders (21.7k subs, ~174k views), 'RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM vs. RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM review' — a direct head-to-head; viewer consensus in the thread: 'the STM is a fantastic lens for $400... but there's just no beating the natural optics found in the F4L,' with a price note that the L is 3x the non-L. (3) Kevin Deal Photography (22.2k subs, ~57k views), 'RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM Review - 4 Years & Counting' — a multi-year owner perspective framed around whether image quality has surprised the reviewer, with a commenter using it on an R5c for video and travel. Caveat: provided excerpts consist largely of viewer comments rather than full transcripts, so direct test-statement claims are limited to what the comments attribute to the videos.

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM lens review with samples

Christopher Frost · 544,860 views

"[comment] Five years later, this lens is now $1300 [comment] The only lens reviews I trust, thanks again Chris :) [comment] Genuinely I love that any time I want to research a lens a Christopher frost video is ALWAYS at the top and the fami…"

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM vs. RF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM review

Camerahoarders · 174,360 views

"[comment] Go with 24-105 STM and buy RF 50mm 1.8 for portrait and low light and buy speed light for your camera Done. [comment] Nice Video. Just as a Price update, the L is now three times the price of the non-L one. [comment] Thank you for…"

Canon RF24-105mm f4 L IS USM Review - 4 Years & Counting

Kevin Deal Photography · 56,922 views

"[comment] What are your thoughts on the RF24-105 f/4 L IS USM? Has it surprised you with its image quality? Tell me in the comments below. [comment] when I saw your RF lens collection my jaw dropped. Dope! [comment] Thank you!! I Just purch…"

03
INTERNET
n=0 · review sites

What the press said

No aggregate ratings were found for this product during the last harvest.
04
BRAND
official source

What the brand says

no brand page found

The official brand page was not successfully scraped during the last harvest.
Buy on Amazon →

* This page may contain affiliate links. No additional cost to you.

SIMILAR IN THIS CATEGORY

See all →
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

9.7

✓ Exceptional VR stabilization — handholding at 200mm with 1/2 sec shutter speeds reported

Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R LM WR

Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R LM WR

9.7

✓ Exceptional sharpness wide open at f/1.4 with strong corner performance

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art

9.5

✓ Excellent sharpness wide open at f/1.4

Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

9.5

✓ Significant improvement in sharpness and bokeh over previous generation

DATA SOURCES & AUDIT

50
YOUTUBE
1
PRODUCTHUNT
3
YOUTUBE VIDEOS

54 data points across 2 platforms, synthesized via GYIBB's Truth Engine and fact-checked against source data before publication.

CONFIDENCE: LOW · ANALYSED: AUGUST 20, 2026 AT 09:19 PM · PROMPT V1.0 · READ METHODOLOGY →

Was this review helpful?

Embed this review

Writing about Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM? Add the GYIBB verdict — free, no account needed.

GYIBB rating for Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM 
<a href="https://gyibb.com/lenses/canon-rf-24-105mm-f-4l-is-usm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
  <img src="https://gyibb.com/badge/lenses/canon-rf-24-105mm-f-4l-is-usm.svg" alt="GYIBB rating for Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM" width="220" height="56">
</a>
← Back to all reviews

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

GYIBB SCORE: 9.4/10

Buy on Amazon →