REVIEWS / NOTE TAKING / OWNER INSIGHTS

🦉 WE READ 519 OWNER COMMENTS

Obsidian Tasks: what owners actually say

Owners value Obsidian's local markdown approach but worry about plugin lock-in and rough sync/publish implementations

LEMMY · 455 HACKERNEWS · 36 REDDIT · 17 PRODUCTHUNT · 7 STACKEXCHANGE · 4

What owners complain about

  • Sync and Publish quality FEW

    Owners describe Obsidian's official Sync and Publish as 'horrendous implementations' of those features, despite being paid offerings

  • Plugin API limitations SOME

    Developers report the plugin API is lacking from a dev perspective, and that features like Dataview should be core rather than community-maintained

  • Not open source SOME

    Multiple users point out Obsidian is not open source, which concerns those who want guarantees about long-term data accessibility and platform direction

  • Format portability concerns SOME

    While files are markdown, owners note Obsidian uses its own syntax extensions and metadata tweaks, meaning a switch to another app could degrade functionality even if raw text survives

  • Repeated false starts FEW

    Users report many false starts with Obsidian before finding a workable flow, suggesting a steep personal-configuration curve

What owners love

  • Local plain-text files

    Owners love that data lives as local markdown files — no database lock-in, and AI models work naturally with .md files

  • Free tier is genuinely sufficient

    Users report the free version covers core needs including task syncing, completion, and creation without forcing an upgrade

  • Extensibility via plugins

    The plugin ecosystem lets users add functionality like Dataview, task management, and meeting templates, tailoring the vault to their workflow

  • Shortcuts and automation friendly

    Because vaults are just text files, users report Apple Shortcuts can push content into Obsidian as fast or faster than native Apple Notes

Surprising patterns

  • Some owners skip Obsidian's sync entirely and just use Syncthing with native markdown editors like Zettlr or Zettel Notes, getting linking features without any paid service
  • Users explicitly compare markdown portability to Evernote and Apple Notes and say they worry less about Obsidian data — even with format extensions — because the raw text is always accessible
  • A recurring sentiment is that the note-taking app market is cyclical: users expect to eventually move on to 'Yet Another Tool,' so format portability matters more than app longevity

WHO SHOULD SKIP IT

Buyers who want a polished, out-of-the-box experience should skip it — owners consistently describe needing extensive trial and error to find a personal flow, and core features like sync are considered rough.

7.6/10 GYIBB verdict
Full review →

Synthesised from 519 real owner comments across 5 platforms. Every point is grounded in the comments — no marketing, no AI guessing. How we do it →