REVIEWS / DEVELOPER TOOLS / OWNER INSIGHTS

🦉 WE READ 118 OWNER COMMENTS

JetBrains Fleet: what owners actually say

Owners were drawn to Fleet's promise of a lightweight, multi-language editor but instead found a sluggish, plugin-less tool that JetBrains has now killed.

HACKERNEWS · 60 YOUTUBE · 40 LEMMY · 12 STACKEXCHANGE · 6

What owners complain about

  • Sluggish despite 'lightweight' promise COMMON

    Multiple users report Fleet was slow to start—even with smart mode disabled—and laggy for a bare text editor; one commenter said it 'competes with Electron apps' and others noted it launched slower than VS Code loaded with extensions.

  • No plugin/extension ecosystem COMMON

    Fleet did not support custom (non-bundled) plugins for most of its life, leaving users unable to install even popular add-ons like a Vim plugin without manual workarounds; lack of extensions is cited as a key reason developers lost interest.

  • Product abandoned COMMON

    JetBrains announced Fleet will be discontinued after Dec 22, 2025, with minimal updates in the months prior; users express frustration and disappointment that the product they invested hope in is being scrapped for an 'agentic development' focus.

  • Not feature-complete for serious work SOME

    Commenters note Fleet wasn't a viable alternative to full IntelliJ/JetBrains IDEs—missing features and robustness needed for professional development—and say existing JetBrains users wouldn't look for a tool like Fleet.

  • Remote development latency/control concerns SOME

    Several users express discomfort with remote/cloud IDE models, citing latency and erosion of tool ownership; some note JetBrains' remote editing was already clunky before Fleet.

What owners love

  • Strong concept for remote and collaborative coding

    Some users appreciated the vision of a cloud-connected, collaborative IDE that could run a backend on a remote server and feel nearly local, addressing increased remote development needs since COVID.

  • Useful for cross-language projects

    One user praised Fleet for multi-language work (Python plus C++, Java, PHP, TypeScript) where individual JetBrains IDEs have bugs or missing features for non-primary languages.

  • Thoughtful design philosophy

    A commenter commended JetBrains for analyzing what makes VS Code successful and thoughtfully incorporating those ideas rather than doing a mindless clone.

  • Fair JetBrains licensing terms

    Users note the individual subscription pricing is reasonable (around $150/year to start), with loyalty discounts, offline keys, and clear renewal notices, making it feel fair.

Surprising patterns

  • Fleet was originally built for Kotlin Multiplatform development before being repositioned as a VS Code competitor, according to one commenter.
  • Several users who were initially hopeful about Fleet ended up switching to Zed editor, which they describe as delivering the fast, lightweight experience Fleet failed to achieve.
  • JetBrains salvaged Fleet's UI work by adopting its theme language (Islands) as the default new theme for the 2025.3 versions of their other IDEs.
  • Some users only discovered Fleet after hearing about its cancellation, indicating extremely low visibility during its active development.

WHO SHOULD SKIP IT

Developers who need a stable, long-term lightweight editor with a rich extension ecosystem should skip Fleet, as it is being discontinued, never gained meaningful plugin support, and multiple owners report it failed to deliver on its speed or feature-completeness promises.

2.9/10 GYIBB verdict
Full review →

Synthesised from 118 real owner comments across 4 platforms. Every point is grounded in the comments — no marketing, no AI guessing. How we do it →