REVIEWS / COMPARE
Plausible Analytics vs PostHog
PostHog edges ahead at 9.5 vs 7.4 — but read the trade-offs below; Plausible Analytics may still be the better fit for you.
| Plausible Analytics | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| RATING | 7.4 / 10 | 9.5 / 10 |
| CONFIDENCE | high | high |
| USER VOICES | 293 | 93 |
| POSITIVE | 60% | 80% |
| PRICE | — | — |
| RECOMMENDED | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Plausible Analytics
★ STRENGTHS
- Open-source and easily self-hostable
- Strict privacy focus without cookies
- Transparent 'build in public' business model
✗ WATCH OUT
- Cloud pricing is heavily criticized for high-traffic, low-revenue sites
- Self-hosting requires technical knowledge (Docker/Elixir)
- Ongoing debates among users about GDPR and hashed IPs
Not recommended Full review →
PostHog
★ STRENGTHS
- Open-source and self-hostable.
- High focus on data privacy and GDPR compliance.
- Cost-effective alternative ($0) to enterprise tools.
✗ WATCH OUT
- Potential scaling and query performance issues compared to multi-tenant SaaS.
- Requires engineering effort to self-host and maintain.
- Monetization model of open-source analytics can create friction.
Not recommended Full review →
HOW THIS COMPARISON WAS BUILT
Both verdicts are synthesised from real user voices on Reddit, YouTube, Hacker News, ProductHunt, Trustpilot and editorial sources — 293 for Plausible Analytics, 93 for PostHog. No paid placement; ratings come from raw sentiment, not our opinion. Read the methodology.