REVIEWS / COMPARE
Fidelity Investments vs Interactive Brokers
Fidelity Investments edges ahead at 8.8 vs 6.0 — but read the trade-offs below; Interactive Brokers may still be the better fit for you.
| Fidelity Investments | Interactive Brokers | |
|---|---|---|
| RATING | 8.8 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| CONFIDENCE | medium | high |
| USER VOICES | 79 | 129 |
| POSITIVE | 65% | 25% |
| PRICE | — | — |
| RECOMMENDED | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Fidelity Investments
★ STRENGTHS
- No minimums on mutual funds (vs. Vanguard's $1,000-$3,000)
- Automatic cash sweep earning 3-4% on uninvested cash
- Fractional share investing across all ETFs (not just proprietary)
✗ WATCH OUT
- Advisory arm employs aggressive sales tactics per long-term customer reports
- Fractional share ownership model unclear — may not truly own shares
- Active traders may find Schwab's platform superior for real-time control
Not recommended Full review →
Interactive Brokers
★ STRENGTHS
- Unique access to international/exotic exchanges (e.g., Warsaw Stock Exchange) at decent rates
- Powerful API for custom options/algo trading workflows
- Well-suited to advanced, professional, and multi-market traders
✗ WATCH OUT
- Charting bugs: charts cut out and reset, price lines won't persist (1-year user report)
- Slow options order entry — user reports trades 'walking away' before fills
- Phone support hold times measured in hours
Not recommended Full review →
HOW THIS COMPARISON WAS BUILT
Both verdicts are synthesised from real user voices on Reddit, YouTube, Hacker News, ProductHunt, Trustpilot and editorial sources — 79 for Fidelity Investments, 129 for Interactive Brokers. No paid placement; ratings come from raw sentiment, not our opinion. Read the methodology.