REVIEWS / COMPARE
Elgato Facecam MK.2 vs Logitech C920x HD Pro
Logitech C920x HD Pro edges ahead at 8.9 vs 7.9 — but read the trade-offs below; Elgato Facecam MK.2 may still be the better fit for you.
| Elgato Facecam MK.2 | Logitech C920x HD Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RATING | 7.9 / 10 | 8.9 / 10 |
| CONFIDENCE | low | low |
| USER VOICES | 67 | 30 |
| POSITIVE | 55% | 75% |
| PRICE | — | — |
| RECOMMENDED | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Elgato Facecam MK.2
★ STRENGTHS
- Surprising image quality for the price—won blind tests against more expensive cameras
- Flat image profile without LUT is ideal for color grading workflows
- Better low-light performance than the original Facecam 4K
✗ WATCH OUT
- Virtual Camera software fails in browsers (Meet, Messenger) and gets stuck at 540p
- Default settings look mediocre—significant Cam Hub tuning required to achieve good results
- USB 3.0 5Gbps cable required; slower cables cause issues and aren't clearly communicated
Logitech C920x HD Pro
★ STRENGTHS
- Universally recommended entry-level standard for streaming
- Reliable 1080p video quality when properly lit
- Easy to mount on thin monitors and laptops
✗ WATCH OUT
- Image quality performs very poorly without external lighting
- "Low light compensation" setting causes severe frame lag
- Known to cause stuttering if the host PC's CPU bottlenecks
HOW THIS COMPARISON WAS BUILT
Both verdicts are synthesised from real user voices on Reddit, YouTube, Hacker News, ProductHunt, Trustpilot and editorial sources — 67 for Elgato Facecam MK.2, 30 for Logitech C920x HD Pro. No paid placement; ratings come from raw sentiment, not our opinion. Read the methodology.