REVIEWS / COMPARE
Backblaze Personal Backup vs Macrium Reflect Home
Macrium Reflect Home edges ahead at 7.8 vs 5.9 — but read the trade-offs below; Backblaze Personal Backup may still be the better fit for you.
| Backblaze Personal Backup | Macrium Reflect Home | |
|---|---|---|
| RATING | 5.9 / 10 | 7.8 / 10 |
| CONFIDENCE | low | high |
| USER VOICES | 69 | 143 |
| POSITIVE | 30% | 45% |
| PRICE | — | — |
| RECOMMENDED | ✗ We don't recommend | ✓ Yes |
Backblaze Personal Backup
★ STRENGTHS
- Genuinely simple setup — true set-it-and-forget-it for non-technical users
- USB hard drive restore service via FedEx (free if drive returned) solves the large-restore problem
- Engineers actively engage with community on HackerNews — rare transparency
✗ WATCH OUT
- 'Unlimited' is under active revision — new terms of service are narrowing what's acceptable
- No Linux client, deliberately — company admits Linux users store too much data to be profitable
- 'Safety freeze' errors can lock backups with unclear remediation, per multiple user reports
Not recommended Full review →
Macrium Reflect Home
★ STRENGTHS
- Respected live-system image backup via Volume Shadow Copy, no direct Linux equivalent noted
- Capable of full disk/partition cloning and bare-metal restore to different hardware
- Testers report it outperforms more expensive alternatives like Acronis
✗ WATCH OUT
- Cloning process can produce unbootable systems — EFI/PXE boot errors reported in video comments
- Subscription pricing model triggers strong rejection from a segment of users
- Tutorial ecosystem creates confusion (third-party ISO burners recommended over native USB tool)
HOW THIS COMPARISON WAS BUILT
Both verdicts are synthesised from real user voices on Reddit, YouTube, Hacker News, ProductHunt, Trustpilot and editorial sources — 69 for Backblaze Personal Backup, 143 for Macrium Reflect Home. No paid placement; ratings come from raw sentiment, not our opinion. Read the methodology.