REVIEWS / COMPARE
Aputure Amaran 200x S vs Aputure LS 300x
It's close — Aputure Amaran 200x S (8.8) and Aputure LS 300x (8.8) score nearly the same across real user voices. Pick on the specifics below.
| Aputure Amaran 200x S | Aputure LS 300x | |
|---|---|---|
| RATING | 8.8 / 10 | 8.8 / 10 |
| CONFIDENCE | low | low |
| USER VOICES | 49 | 61 |
| POSITIVE | 68% | 65% |
| PRICE | — | — |
| RECOMMENDED | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Aputure Amaran 200x S
★ STRENGTHS
- SSI scores deliver tungsten-quality light at a fraction of the cost
- Sidus Link app control integrates with Aputure ecosystem
- Within 10% brightness of the more expensive LS 300x
✗ WATCH OUT
- Plastic Bowen's mount raises durability concerns for heavy modifier use
- No wired DMX support limits studio integration
- Narrower 26° beam angle with supplied reflector vs. 55° on LS 300x
Aputure LS 300x
★ STRENGTHS
- Premium metal build quality
- Useful bi-color point source for mixing temperatures
- Professional features like wired DMX and V-mount slots
✗ WATCH OUT
- Poor brightness-to-price ratio compared to cheaper alternatives
- Heavy and bulky compared to the Amaran 200x S
- Considered underpowered for large professional film sets
HOW THIS COMPARISON WAS BUILT
Both verdicts are synthesised from real user voices on Reddit, YouTube, Hacker News, ProductHunt, Trustpilot and editorial sources — 49 for Aputure Amaran 200x S, 61 for Aputure LS 300x. No paid placement; ratings come from raw sentiment, not our opinion. Read the methodology.